The effects of Electronic Word of Mouth (eWOM) on the adoption of consumer eWOM information

Article Sidebar

PDF HTML
Published: Oct 1, 2020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.14807/ijmp.v11i6.1152
Keywords:
eWOM the trust of eWOM the quantity of eWOM the quality of eWOM consumer expertise adoption of eWOM information.

Main Article Content

Phuong Viet Le-Hoang
Industrial University of Ho Chi Minh City Open University of Ho Chi Minh City
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4330-7622
صندلی اداری

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to explore and test the effect of electronic Word-of-mouth (eWOM) on the adoption of consumer eWOM information. Through the credibility variables of the eWOM, namely the trust of the eWOM news source, the quantity of eWOM, the quality of eWOM and consumer expertise in the case of female consumers when buying cosmetics in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam. To achieve this goal, the author does conduct research by submitting an online survey questionnaire and obtained 200 valid questionnaires. The online questionnaire has targeted internet users, who have previously purchased online and read reviews online received from the provider's website. The result from Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) shows that consumer expertise has the most significant effect on consumer adoption of eWOM information while the number of eWOM has the least impact. Besides, the credibility of eWOM news sources and the quality of eWOM also indirectly affect the adoption of eWOM information. What is more, the study suggests some recommendations to cosmetic businesses so that they develop applications or websites where assessments and quality of information are relevant, and the current expertise of consumers is increasingly present.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

Issue
Vol. 11 No. 6 (2020): Independent Journal of Management & Production
Section
Articles

1. Proposal of Policy for Free Access Periodics

Authors whom publish in this magazine should agree to the following terms:

a. Authors should keep the copyrights and grant to the magazine the right of the first publication, with the work simultaneously permitted under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 that allows the sharing of the work with recognition of the authorship of the work and initial publication in this magazine.

b. Authors should have authorization for assuming additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this magazine (e.g.: to publish in an institutional repository or as book chapter), with recognition of authorship and initial publication in this magazine.

c. Authors should have permission and should be stimulated to publish and to distribute its work online (e.g.: in institutional repositories or its personal page) to any point before or during the publishing process, since this can generate productive alterations, as well as increasing the impact and the citation of the published work (See The Effect of Free Access).

 

Proposal of Policy for Periodic that offer Postponed Free Access

Authors whom publish in this magazine should agree to the following terms:

 

a. Authors should keep the copyrights and grant to the magazine the right of the first publication, with the work simultaneously permitted under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 [SPECIFY TIME HERE] after the publication, allowing the sharing of the work with recognition of the authorship of the work and initial publication in this magazine.

 

b. Authors should have authorization for assuming additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this magazine (e.g.: to publish in institutional repository or as book chapter), with recognition of authorship and initial publication in this magazine.

 

c. Authors should have permission and should be stimulated to publish and to distribute its work online (e.g.: in institutional repositories or its personal page) to any point before or during the publishing process, since this can generate productive alterations, as well as increasing the impact and the citation of the published work (See The Effect of Free Access).


d. They allow some kind of open dissemination. Authors can disseminate their articles in open access, but with specific conditions imposed by the editor that are related to:
     Version of the article that can be deposited in the repository:
           Pre-print: before being reviewed by pairs.
           Post-print: once reviewed by pairs, which can be:
                  The version of the author that has been accepted for publication.
                  The editor's version, that is, the article published in the magazine.
           At which point the article can be made accessible in an open manner: before it is published in the magazine, immediately afterwards or if a period of seizure is required, which can range from six months to several years.
      Where to leave open: on the author's personal web page, only departmental websites, the repository of the institution, the file of the research funding agency, among others.

Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

References

AJZEN, I. (1991) The theory of planned behavior. Organizational behavior and human decision processes, v. 50, n. 2, p. 179-211.

AWAD, N. F.; ROGOWSKY, A. (2008) Establishing trust in electronic commerce though online word of mouth: An examination across genders. Journal of Management Information Systems, v. 24, n. 4, p. 101-121.

BANSAL, H. S.; BOYER, P. A. (2000) Word-ofmouth processes within a services purchase decision context. Journal of service research, v. 3, p. 166-177.

BHATTACHERJEE, A.; SANFORD, C. (2006) Influence processes for information technology acceptance: An elaboration likelihood model. MIS Quarterly, v. 30, n. 4, p. 805-835.

BICKART, B.; SCHINDLER, R. M. (2001) Internet forums as influential sources of consumer information. Journal of interactive marketing, v. 15, p. 31-40.

CHATTERJEE, P. (2001) Online Reviews – Do Consumers Use Them? Association for Consumer Research, v. 28, p. 129-134.

CHEUNG, C. M.; THADANI, D. R. (2010) The Effectiveness of Electronic Word-of-Mouth Communication: A Literature Analysis. In: Implications for the Individual, Enterprises and Society. Bled: Bled eConference eTrust, p.331-340.

CHEUNG, C. M.; THADANI, D. R. (2012) The impact of electronic word-of-mouth communication: A literature analysis and integrative model. Decision support systems, v. 54, n. 1, p. 461-470.

CHEUNG, C. M.; LEE, M. K.; RABJOHN, N. (2008) The impact of electronic word-of-mouth: The adoption of online opinions in online customer communities. Internet research, v. 18, n. 3, p. 229-247.

CHEUNG, M. Y.; LUO, C.; SIA, C. L.; CHEN, H. (2009) Credibility of electronic word-of-mouth: Informational and normative determinants of online consumer recommendations. International journal of electronic commerce, v. 4, p. 9-38.

DABHOLKAR, P. A. (2006) Factors influencing consumer choice of a “rating web site”: An experimental investigation of an online interactive decision aid. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, v. 14, n. 4, p. 259-273.

DAVIS, F. D. (1989) Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS quarterly, v. 13, n. 3, p. 319-340.

DELONE, W. H.; MCLEAN, E. R. (1992) Information systems success: The quest for the dependent variable. Information Systems Research, v. 3, n. 4, p. 60-95.

DOU, X.; WALDEN, J. A.; LEE, S.; LEE, J. Y. (2012) Does source matter? Examining source effects in online product reviews. Computers in Human Behavior, v. 28, n. 5, p. 1555-1563.

FAN, Y. W.; MIAO, Y. F. (2012) Effect of electronic word-of-mouth on consumer purchase intention: The perspective of gender differences. International Journal of Electronic Business Management, v. 10, n. 3, p. 175-181.

FAN, Y. W.; MIAO, Y. F.; FANG, Y. H.; LIN, R. Y. (2013) Establishing the adoption of electronic word-of-mouth through consumers’ perceived credibility. International Business Research, v. 6, n. 3, p. 58-65.

HAIR, J. F.; ANDERSON, R. E.; TATHAM, R. L.; BLACK, W. C. (2006) Multivariate data analysis. Prentice-Hall, International, Inc, 6.

HENNIG-THURAU, T.; GWINNER, K. P.; WALSH, G.; GREMLER, D. D. (2004) Electronic word-of-mouth via consumer-opinion platforms: What motivates consumers to articulate themselves on the Internet? Journal of Interactive Marketing, v. 18, n. 1, p. 38-52.

HUSSAIN, S.; AHMED, W.; JAFAR, R. M. S.; RABNAWAZ, A.; JIANZHOU, Y. (2017) eWOM source credibility, perceived risk and food product customer’s information adoption. Computers in Human Behavior, v. 66, p. 96–102.

ISMAGILOVA, E.; SLADE, E.; RANA, N. P.; DWIVEDI, Y. K. (2019) The effect of characteristics of source credibility on consumer behaviour: A meta-analysis. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services.

KIM, S.; PARK, H. (2013) Effects of various characteristics of s-commerce on consumers’ trust and trust performance. International Journal of Information Management, v. 33, n. 2, p. 318-332.

KING, R. A.; PRADEEP, R.; VICTORIA, D. B. (2014) What We Know and Don’t Know About Online Word-of-Mouth: A Review and Synthesis of the Literature. Journal of Interactive Marketing, v. 28, n. 3, p. 167-183.

KUMAR, N.; BENBASAT, I. (2006) Research note: The influence of recommendations and consumer reviews on evaluations of websites. Information Systems Research, v. 17, n. 4, p. 425-439.

LUO, C.; WU, J.; SHI, Y.; XU, Y. (2014) The effects of individualism–collectivism cultural orientation on eWOM information. International Journal of Information Management, v. 34, n. 4, p. 446–456.

NUNNALLY, J. C.; BERNSTEIN, I. H. (1994) The Assessment of Reliability. Psychometric Theory, v. 3, n. 1, p. 248-292.

PARK, D. H.; KIM, S. (2008) The effects of consumer knowledge on message processing of electronic word-of-mouth via online consumer reviews. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, v. 7, p. 399-410.

PARK, D. H.; LEE, J.; HAN, I. (2007) The effect of on-line consumer reviews on consumer purchasing intention: The moderating role of involvement. International journal of electronic commerce, v. 4, p. 125-148.

PETTY, R. E.; CACIOPPO, J. T. (1986) Communication and Persuasion: Central and Peripheral Routes to Attitude Change. New York: Springer-Verlag.

PETTY, R. E.; CACIOPPO, J. T.; SCHUMANN, D. (1983) Central and peripheral routes to advertising effectiveness: The moderating role of involvement. Journal of Consumer Research, v. 10, n. 2, p. 135-146.

RATCHFORD, B.; TALUKDAR, D.; LEE, M. (2001) A model of consumer choice of the Internet as an information source. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, v. 5, n. 3, p. 7-22.

SEE-TO, E. W.; HO, K. K. (2014) Value cocreation and purchase intention in social network sites: The role of electronic Word-of-Mouth and trust–A theoretical analysis. Computers in Human Behavior, v. 31, p. 182-189.

SHU, M.; SCOTT, N. (2014). Influence of social media on Chinese students’ choice of an overseas study destination: An information adoption model perspective. Journal of Travel and Tourism Marketing, v. 31, n. 2, p. 286-302.

SUSSMAN, S. W.; SIEGAL, W. S. (2003) Informational influence in organizations: An integrated approach to knowledge adoption. Information systems research, v. 14, n. 1, p. 47-65.

TENG, S.; KHONG, K. W.; GOH, W. W.; CHONG, A. Y. L. (2014). Examining the antecedents of persuasive EWOM messages in social media. Online Information Review, v. 38, n. 6, p. 746-768.

WATHEN, C. N.; BURKELL, J. (2002) Believe it or not: Factors influencing credibility on the Web. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, v. 53, n. 2, p. 134-144.

ZHANG, J. Q.; CRACIUN, G.; SHIN, D. (2010) When does electronic word-of-mouth matter? A study of consumer product reviews. Journal of Business Research, v. 63, n. 12, p. 1336-1341.

ZHU, F.; ZHANG, M. (2010) Impact of Online Consumer Reviews on Sales: The Moderating Role of Product and Consumer Characteristics. Journal of Marketing, v. 74, n. 2, p. 133-148.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >> 
فروشگاه اینترنتی